Primary Outcome: · Mean change in central subfield thickness at 6 months* Secondary Outcomes: · Mean change in retinal volume from baseline at 6 months · Percentage of eyes with CST below OCT machine- and gender-specific threshold for DME and at least a 10% decrease from baseline at 6 months · Mean change in ETDRS BCVA from baseline at 6 months · Percentage of eyes receiving other treatment for DME · Percentage of eyes with =5 letter loss at the final two consecutive visits or =10 letter loss at the final visit in ETDRS BCVA Exploratory Outcomes: · Percent of eyes with worsening or improvement of diabetic retinopathy on fundus photographs · Mean change in eGFR from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in CRP from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in Cystatin C from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in TSH from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in Galectin 3 from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in IL-1 ß from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in IL-6 from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in TNFa from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in urine creatinine from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in urine albumin from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in urine MCP1 from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in urine osteopontin from baseline to 6 months · Mean change in urine IL-18 from baseline to 6 months · Mean changes in OCTA vessel density and nonperfusion area · Change in CST from 6 to 12 months · Change in retinal volume from 6 to 12 months · CST below the OCT machine- and gender-specific threshold for DME at 12 months and a 10% or more decrease in CST from 6 to 12 months · Change in ETDRS BCVA from 6 to 12 monthsReceiving other treatment for DME between the 6 and 12-month visit · Changes in blood and urine samples from 6 to 12 months Safety Outcomes of Interest: Headache, drowsiness, dizziness, effect on renal function (change in eGFR) and liver function, effect on blood counts and metabolic panel. * Change in CST will not be used to definitively establish efficacy. If an anatomical difference is observed in this phase 2 trial compared to placebo the results would suggest that this medication merits further investigation in a definitive, phase 3 trial. |